home - to The Greyhound-Database
Home  |  Dog-Search  |  Dogs ID  |  Races  |  Race Cards  |  Coursing  |  Tracks  |  Statistic  |  Testmating  |  Kennels  
 
   SHOP
Facebook
Login  |  Private Messages  |  add_race  |  add_coursing  |  add_dog  |  Membership  |  Advertising  | Ask the Vet  | Memorials    Help  print pedigree      
TV  |  Active-Sires  |  Sire-Pages  |  Stud Dogs  |  Which Sire?  |  Classifieds  |  Auctions  |  Videos  |  Adoption  |  Forum  |  About_us  |  Site Usage

Welcome to the Greyhound Knowledge Forum

   

The Greyhound-Data Forum has been created to act as a platform for greyhound enthusiasts to share information on this magnificent animal called a greyhound.

Greyhound-Data reserve the right to remove any post that is off topic, advertisements or opinions they consider to be offensive.

Please read the forum usage manual please note:

If you answer then please try to stay on topic. It's absolutely okay to answer in a broader scope but don't hijack posts by switching to something off topic.

In case you see an insulting post: DO NOT REPLY TO IT!
Use the report button to inform the moderators so that we can delete it.

Read more...

All TopicsFor SaleGD-WebsiteBreedingHealthRacingCoursingRetirementBettingTalkLogin to post
Do you have questions how to use the Greyhound-Data website?
Or do you have ideas how to improve the site?

Drugs - Myths or Not?page  1 2 

Bruce Teague
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 2092
Dogs 0 / Races 0

17 Dec 2018 23:34


 (9)
 (0)


How soon will it be before owners or trainers with good legal support challenge the very foundations of drug rules?

Already, there is a mini-flood of mares from Victoria and other states to NSW because the latter allows females to race with trenbolone, trendione or epitrenbolone below a mass concentration of 1 microgram per litre. These emerge from progestogen altrenogest or, commercially, Regu-Mate which is designed to stop horses coming on season. Victoria has a zero limit. (See Chris Roots report in the SMH, 17 December).

The subject is being complicated by an ever increasing selection of drugs, more finite detection equipment in labs, a myriad of items found in everyday foods, and a general absence of any proof of performance-enhancing capabilities.

For both horses and greyhounds, cobalt and arsenic are just the latest additions to a no-tolerance or limited amount attitude to drug controls all without reliable evidence of their impacts. In other words, it has been guesswork.

At least one scientifically based report has rubbished any performance improvement from cobalt; additionally, it claims that testing from urine samples is pointless as it fails to recognise correctly how the substance moves through the animals system.





Kevin Wright
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 5708
Dogs 1 / Races 1

18 Dec 2018 01:46


 (6)
 (0)


Bruce Teague wrote:

How soon will it be before owners or trainers with good legal support challenge the very foundations of drug rules?

Already, there is a mini-flood of mares from Victoria and other states to NSW because the latter allows females to race with trenbolone, trendione or epitrenbolone below a mass concentration of 1 microgram per litre. These emerge from progestogen altrenogest or, commercially, Regu-Mate which is designed to stop horses coming on season. Victoria has a zero limit. (See Chris Roots report in the SMH, 17 December).

The subject is being complicated by an ever increasing selection of drugs, more finite detection equipment in labs, a myriad of items found in everyday foods, and a general absence of any proof of performance-enhancing capabilities.

For both horses and greyhounds, cobalt and arsenic are just the latest additions to a no-tolerance or limited amount attitude to drug controls all without reliable evidence of their impacts. In other words, it has been guesswork.

At least one scientifically based report has rubbished any performance improvement from cobalt; additionally, it claims that testing from urine samples is pointless as it fails to recognise correctly how the substance moves through the animals system.


Bruce once again you hit the nail on the head
...I see the RADB hearings have not been updated since the Paul Anderton case ...but before that they used to publish it days after you were charged and all VCAT hearings now are not displayed for the very same reason you have pointed out in your post its a SCAM
All Cobalt and Arsenic cases must be contested because you will win in a COURT OF LAW...




Julie Grindley
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 679
Dogs 39 / Races 0

18 Dec 2018 02:05


 (16)
 (0)


That's easier said than done Kevin.My brother got 6mths with 4 mths suspended and a $500 fine in November,for Arsenic.Hes been training for over 30yrs and was his first offence.
He didn't appeal,mainly financial reasons.Hes on a disability pension,so it just wasn't possible.
He paid his fine and is doing his time.
Its cruel when there are some still training when actual performance enhancing drugs have been used.
Just a joke the RADB



Kevin Wright
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 5708
Dogs 1 / Races 1

18 Dec 2018 02:42


 (18)
 (0)


julie grindley wrote:

That's easier said than done Kevin.My brother got 6mths with 4 mths suspended and a $500 fine in November,for Arsenic.Hes been training for over 30yrs and was his first offence.
He didn't appeal,mainly financial reasons.Hes on a disability pension,so it just wasn't possible.
He paid his fine and is doing his time.
Its cruel when there are some still training when actual performance enhancing drugs have been used.
Just a joke the RADB

This has been the GRV and the RADB main attack to go after the weak and small .

It's a BULLY BOY tactic ..... plain and simple they have targeted the Hobby trainers more so than the PRO boys .

We have all read the RADB and GRV hearings over the years and a double standard designed to take out as many Hobby Trainers as possible because we are all a Liability to the GRV ..

As you said Julie your Brother was Bullied because of his Financial situation and this is something that must stop now.

The GRV today have Social Media spies employed only to follow us on Social Media
This is why i have been as vocal as i can without getting disqualified but lets call a SPADE A SPADE and the GRV need to stop pretending to be out there helping us all .

Some people have been treated very badly by the GRV and the RADB board in Victoria and this just goes to show Us Julie why it's so WRONG to be judged this way when others have walked free for the same offence or even worse offences they have walked away with just a fine or suspended sentence....




Bruce Teague
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 2092
Dogs 0 / Races 0

18 Dec 2018 05:35


 (2)
 (2)


Kevin,

Whoa back. I understand the hardship but the problem lies primarily with GA, which does all the alleged testing as well as commissioning outside studies.

GRV and others are just saluting the flag. Of course, if they were professional about it they would call for more comprehensive assessments. Mind you, that would be odd because the same GRV and others voted for it in the first place around the GA table.

That said, it is hard to remember any GA significant investigation which would stand up to serious analysis. On this subject the longstanding GA policy is to ban anything and everything, regardless of its likely effect on performance.

RADB will be no help as it will simply refer to existing rules - ie if you are on the banned list you have no recourse. I doubt RADB will debate the value of certain chemicals. So the attack must be at the point where the rule is created.

The underlying principle I brought up here is that two great minds - RV and RNSW - have different interpretations about the same substance. Therefore one or both have to be wrong. By extension, any substance on that list has to be suspect.

Let me extend further. It is incumbent on GRV or any other authority to consider the full impact of any rules they make - whether unintended consequences or not. "Reasonable" and "fair" come into it - which is where this discussion should be centred.
You can't just ban Cornflakes because you happen to like Weetbix. Quasi-government bodies cannot just make up rules on a whim.

This is precisely the sort of thing that the various GBOTAs should be tackling - if necessary by levying members or using crowd funding to mount a serious case in law. There is a prima facie case that a ban on cobalt (or arsenic) is costing people hard cash but without achieving anything positive for the industry.

PS Unless you have proof I would discount your comments about targeting hobby trainers. The source of nearly all GRV drug activity is swabbing of winners. No win = no swab = no penalty.




Kenneth Markham
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 252
Dogs 0 / Races 0

18 Dec 2018 07:10


 (4)
 (0)


And therein lies an issue where performance improvements or lack of dont seem to be as important anymore if the no win no swab rule is correct.Cobalt rule is to be challenged in NSW real soon as is the validity of swabs as in GA rules regarding swabs it specifies a class of people such as vets must do the testing so a person who does a 2 day course cannot be regarded in the same class which may cause serious concerns as to legal validity.Bring on the fight as until authorities take swabbing seriously and professionally this case may embarrass the PTB.I know the research and scientific report u mention Bruce will be very prominent in this case as will its author.


Bruce Teague
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 2092
Dogs 0 / Races 0

19 Dec 2018 23:29


 (2)
 (0)


kenneth markham wrote:

And therein lies an issue where performance improvements or lack of dont seem to be as important anymore if the no win no swab rule is correct.Cobalt rule is to be challenged in NSW real soon as is the validity of swabs as in GA rules regarding swabs it specifies a class of people such as vets must do the testing so a person who does a 2 day course cannot be regarded in the same class which may cause serious concerns as to legal validity.Bring on the fight as until authorities take swabbing seriously and professionally this case may embarrass the PTB.I know the research and scientific report u mention Bruce will be very prominent in this case as will its author.

Ken,

The scientific report we are talking about is extremely important but not just for the obvious reason.

Cobalt is alleged to improve red blood cell activity (as with EPO) which is not claimed to improve speed but does help endurance. Cycling and other evidence may well support that contention but it is yet to be proved on another animal - ie greyhounds or even horses (now being tested in USA).

More important is the expert claim that urine or even blood testing for cobalt is dubious post race because of the different way it is absorbed into the body and that a urine check is the wrong place to look. That needs validation.

Whatever a challenge might bring out, it is important to do it anyway as it demonstrates to authorities that they cannot just introduce a rule without proper study and a balanced justification. So far, the best they can claim is that the ban is a protection against "potential abuse", which is pretty weak.

Similar but different objections might be made should any authority try to impose the "puppy bond" which has been rumoured in NSW. That is no more than an insurance policy in case something bad happens - ie it is conjectural and therefore unacceptable.

Clearly, the legal route is the only one which will put participants on a even footing with authorities.




Kenneth Markham
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 252
Dogs 0 / Races 0

20 Dec 2018 00:52


 (8)
 (0)


The legal Avenue is the way but unfortunately it takes those that can afford to fight out on their own.The biggest hurdle for most is the funds to fight and authorities know but if trainers banded together then financially the pressure would be shared and the authorities could be put on notice.I am watching eagerly at the case against the cobalt rule and support the challenge 100%.the so called studies are uncontrolled so are clearly flawed.


Brett Tooth
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 92
Dogs 10 / Races 0

24 Dec 2018 00:55


 (7)
 (0)


I got out of training as GRNSW (& all its spinoffs) have created a great game of Russian roulette for hobby trainers. I'm no chemist & either are the imbeciles making the rules in regards to cobalt, arsenic etc. I asked GRNSW to show me what the equation is to work out how much of each substance ( which are not illegal, only dosage rates) is in products fed to dogs I trained. Problem is ingredients are in all different types of %'s, some that I have no clue what they mean, also varying size of dogs, some products build up in dogs system & some don't. What hope did I have. The guilty until proven innocent outlook of GRNSW towards trainers & their dictator ways was enough for me ( & many others, with more to follow) pull the pin. I never had a positive after numerous swabs, but in reality, I don't know how close or far I come as results of tests were never revealed to trainers.
I once queried the magical 100 figure to stewards & suggested a dogs trainer that tested 80+ be given a warning they are approaching dangerous ground. I also asked if I could have a dog tested ( at my cost I was told) to find out what my reading was for a dog in training for many weeks. I could but only be given an under or over 100 answer ( no number). Big help that is if dog was on 99 & next start a week later wins & goes 100 (joke).
OTHER JOKES (welfare) introduced
Water bowls in kennels, so dogs could go out & race with a gut full of water. Hydration of a dog is ongoing, from its last trial/race until it's next, not only hours before racing. I even asked to be shown the stewards reports from past years that stated dehydrated dogs (the ones that don't exist)
Banning of barking muzzles, apparently it is in a dogs best welfare to bark for a few hours & then go out & race than to be controlled & save its energy. I only used it on a few dogs & once the rule changed those dogs were useless, ran race in kennels.
Even though I don't train anymore & never will again, I still keep an eye on what changes are in store for trainers. I can't wait to see the new hoops trainers will have to jump through to continue in the game (Russian roulette).
Good luck.


Bruce Teague
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 2092
Dogs 0 / Races 0

24 Dec 2018 04:33


 (2)
 (0)


Brett,

The entire deal is akin to overprescribing of antibiotics by doctors - to the extent that they are now useless for many conditions.

The pattern is such that it is easy for authorities to add a new rule - bureaucrats tend to get paid according to the complexity of the rule book - and then say that it is risky to do any less because X or Y may be harmed. Note "may", not "will".

The water bowl is a classic. In days gone by it was said to be a frequent practice to give the dog a big drink (or a big swim) prior to kennelling if the trainer wanted to retard its performance - ie setting it up for a subsequent killing in the ring. Now they float the "welfare" risk of dehydration, irrespective of the facts.

The underlying problem is the culture of state authorities and therefore GA. Almost none of the stuff you mention is a product of an individual state, rather it is an outcome of some brainwave mentioned at a GA meeting and then expanded via incorrect or unscientific methods into a new rule - or an addition to an already long and tortuous one. The worth or the validity is irrelevant; it is no more than an action you take when someone comes up with an idea. But it looks good on paper or when you have to report to the Minister.

So GA does its bit and sends a copy around to each state, which then automatically adopt it.

You might recall the same lunacy applied to the "confidential memo" from GA to all states suggesting race numbers and breeding should be cut by one third thereby giving the McHugh Commission and the other two Inquiry leaders and many others ammunition to near destroy the industry. All in the name of overbreeding - which had never occurred anyway.

It's all bluff but they are allowed to get away with it.




Kenneth Markham
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 252
Dogs 0 / Races 0

24 Dec 2018 06:32


 (2)
 (0)


The level of 100 Nanograms is a croc when u sit down to analyse the amount it is a billionth of a gram which doesnt fit on a pin head but yet it is suppose to help endurance absolute BS at that level.The authorities should be looking at what levels are injectable levels after all thats what they dont want us to do.And to date they cannot tell u what that level that is so that is what has to be challenged a true testing regime would know that level.The other issue is that cobalt is not a drug its a trace metal mineral.I have stated this on official tape recordings but the steward who taped it will be questioned next time I meet up with him.


Tony Digiorgio
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 1008
Dogs 25 / Races 0

24 Dec 2018 08:04


 (3)
 (0)


Make sure you have someone with you Ken when you question them.



Kevin Wright
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 5708
Dogs 1 / Races 1

24 Dec 2018 19:46


 (4)
 (0)


cobalt is not a drug its a trace metal mineral.
Spot on Kenneth Cobalt is in so many foods .
I have a three citrus trees in my backyard
Oranges Lemons and Mandarins these too will give a positive to Arsenic ..

The bullsh1t has to stop ,
To many Honest people are getting positives and even at the hearings no one is getting told what levels they have recorded only that your dog has gone over 100 Ng
Plus they also play good cop bad cop with many left feeling SET UP and many are left wondering Just what happened because some get railroaded while others get a small fine and suspended sentences ..




Kenneth Markham
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 252
Dogs 0 / Races 0

25 Dec 2018 04:14


 (4)
 (0)


Tony Digiorgio wrote:

Make sure you have someone with you Ken when you question them.

No I will be doing it on my own they were suppose to do their job but instead they did a job on me.We are responsible for what we do with actions but their case inactions so they will be accountable to me.I have stated before just give me shit boxes I dont care Ill just find faster dogs.Tony I cant be silenced because as Kevin says we dont get treated equally not even close and the RADB in their stupidity and their ineptitude to deal with things their own way inadvertantly gave me a consecutive sentence even though the first of 2 offences occurred in Victoria.I also realised the chief vet speaks GRV language and not the truth for fear of not having a job.Even criminals get concurrent sentences.I know it sounds like I am crooked on GRV but GRNSW are just as bad.



Kevin Wright
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 5708
Dogs 1 / Races 1

25 Dec 2018 06:02


 (1)
 (0)


kenneth markham wrote:

Tony Digiorgio wrote:

Make sure you have someone with you Ken when you question them.

No I will be doing it on my own they were suppose to do their job but instead they did a job on me.We are responsible for what we do with actions but their case inactions so they will be accountable to me.I have stated before just give me shit boxes I dont care Ill just find faster dogs.Tony I cant be silenced because as Kevin says we dont get treated equally not even close and the RADB in their stupidity and their ineptitude to deal with things their own way inadvertantly gave me a consecutive sentence even though the first of 2 offences occurred in Victoria.I also realised the chief vet speaks GRV language and not the truth for fear of not having a job.Even criminals get concurrent sentences.I know it sounds like I am crooked on GRV but GRNSW are just as bad.

Kenneth could you post your charges to Data so that we all then can compare past offences and charges and sentences other participants have got .

By making it public you then expose the TRUTH for us all to then see and i can assure it will get shared and compared...

Keep the bastards honest Mate and i urge you to take them on and play the same game as they play with us all ....Shirt front them ...hit them hard with FACTS and past cases ...Expose them all ...



Kenneth Markham
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 252
Dogs 0 / Races 0

25 Dec 2018 06:25


 (0)
 (0)


Healesville levels 156 b sample 129 then 8 days later 124 Nowra b sample 109.GRNSW give 10 weeks then after I am 5 weeks into the second offence the RADB give me 2 months effectively 13 weeks with no priors in 35 years of training.The substance was amino cal powder.What irks me is that my padlocked gate meant nothing and not a courtesy call to say theres an issue can we access your property.When they enter my kennel my friend who resides here and is licenced was told to leave wtf.This is my property I determine who comes and goes.



Kevin Wright
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 5708
Dogs 1 / Races 1

25 Dec 2018 06:47


 (1)
 (0)


kenneth markham wrote:

Healesville levels 156 b sample 129 then 8 days later 124 Nowra b sample 109.GRNSW give 10 weeks then after I am 5 weeks into the second offence the RADB give me 2 months effectively 13 weeks with no priors in 35 years of training.The substance was amino cal powder.What irks me is that my padlocked gate meant nothing and not a courtesy call to say theres an issue can we access your property.When they enter my kennel my friend who resides here and is licenced was told to leave wtf.This is my property I determine who comes and goes.

Thanks Kenneth ...

Have you been in contact with anyone from the GOTBA or the NSW Greyhound Owners and trainers .
If not i would suggest trying to use these people so that they can assist you further .
35 Years i know how it feels mate i was one who got pinged Disqualified for Testaprop when the new levels come in but they did not tell me my levels only that they were above above the threshold.
I also had a clean record and the GRV also breached me with days to go because i replied to a Email from the Shepparton Club Manager Tony McGrath regarding advertisement ..
I was followed taped and i was harrassed and i was railroaded at the hearing .. .
I was set up by the GRV and the GRV even sent Vets and stewards Hundreds of miles away up near Albury to conduct tests on bitches they claimed i had served while i was suspended ....

I believe i was also phone taped because there is no other way they could of got any of this information otherwise ..

At the time the GRV team where conducting secrets recordings of it's Members i know that for a fact and i have the proof .

The GRV spent 10s of Thousands of $$$$ on trying to catch me out i know this for a fact .the PROOF IS THERE IN THE PAPERWORK AT THE GRV Headquarters......Under file Name Kevin Wright Public Owner Breeder trainer number 32280 Exp 29/12/2019

I along with many others understand your frustration and the only regret i have is that i did not have the balls to take them on i hope you can ..

Have a great 2019 and time goes fast but the bitter taste remains ..Cheers Kenneth


Kenneth Markham
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 252
Dogs 0 / Races 0

25 Dec 2018 07:01


 (0)
 (0)


I dont trust the GOBTA as its lead by elite trainers with their own agendas and the GBOTA in nsw is a farce.I thank my friends for their support and realise the best way to beat them is to pump out the winners maybe one soon?



Kevin Wright
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 5708
Dogs 1 / Races 1

25 Dec 2018 07:18


 (5)
 (0)


kenneth markham wrote:

I dont trust the GOBTA as its lead by elite trainers with their own agendas and the GBOTA in nsw is a farce.I thank my friends for their support and realise the best way to beat them is to pump out the winners maybe one soon?

Kenneth i understand but by us the OTB making a stand and airing our concerns publicly makes them all sit up and take notice .

The PTB all read everything every person posts on all forums and social media pages so by speaking up it rattles the chains and creates something for them to talk about at there next pow wow meeting ..

I am also aware that many within Government circles get the smoke signals as well when they see and read these things in forums and lets face it Trump won because he controlled the Social Media so we have a tool to use and let's face it many are just walking away today from the sport because of the PTB irresponsible rules and regulations and the over the top penalties they dish out to some but use a different set of rules for others this has to stop ..

If the PTB we really after the cheats they would test for fertagal and they would make sure every Vet has his records in order .
If Vets sell the stuff then there would be a footprint somewhere ..

Peptides are easy to order and buy so why not go after the people who import them into Australia ...for the racing industry ....




Tony Digiorgio
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 1008
Dogs 25 / Races 0

25 Dec 2018 19:34


 (1)
 (0)


kenneth markham wrote:

Tony Digiorgio wrote:

Make sure you have someone with you Ken when you question them.

No I will be doing it on my own they were suppose to do their job but instead they did a job on me.We are responsible for what we do with actions but their case inactions so they will be accountable to me.I have stated before just give me shit boxes I dont care Ill just find faster dogs.Tony I cant be silenced because as Kevin says we dont get treated equally not even close and the RADB in their stupidity and their ineptitude to deal with things their own way inadvertantly gave me a consecutive sentence even though the first of 2 offences occurred in Victoria.I also realised the chief vet speaks GRV language and not the truth for fear of not having a job.Even criminals get concurrent sentences.I know it sounds like I am crooked on GRV but GRNSW are just as bad.

All the more reason to have someone with you.
Rest assured nothing will be "recorded" in you favour
against the PTB. Unless they allow you to record the conversation but I can't see that happening.

posts 27page  1 2