home - to The Greyhound-Database
Home  |  Dog-Search  |  Dogs ID  |  Races  |  Race Cards  |  Coursing  |  Tracks  |  Statistic  |  Testmating  |  Kennels  
 
   SHOP
Facebook
Login  |  Private Messages  |  add_race  |  add_coursing  |  add_dog  |  Membership  |  Advertising  | Ask the Vet  | Memorials    Help  print pedigree      
TV  |  Active-Sires  |  Sire-Pages  |  Stud Dogs  |  Which Sire?  |  Classifieds  |  Auctions  |  Videos  |  Adoption  |  Forum  |  About_us  |  Site Usage

Welcome to the Greyhound Knowledge Forum

   

The Greyhound-Data Forum has been created to act as a platform for greyhound enthusiasts to share information on this magnificent animal called a greyhound.

Greyhound-Data reserve the right to remove any post that is off topic, advertisements or opinions they consider to be offensive.

Please read the forum usage manual please note:

If you answer then please try to stay on topic. It's absolutely okay to answer in a broader scope but don't hijack posts by switching to something off topic.

In case you see an insulting post: DO NOT REPLY TO IT!
Use the report button to inform the moderators so that we can delete it.

Read more...

All TopicsFor SaleGD-WebsiteBreedingHealthRacingCoursingRetirementBettingTalkLogin to post
Do you have questions about breeding theories?
Or do you need tips on how to rear your pups?

Greyhound Fee'spage  1 2 3 


Dan Hollywood
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4166
Dogs 3 / Races 3

02 Aug 2014 04:37


 (0)
 (0)


Folks - the relevance of the story on Ian Turnbull and the Senior Compliance Officer Glendon Turner is bound in the simple question - WHO owns the title to the land?

And with reference to the 6 keys of control of the Aust Govt - see FLORA #24 & 26 - control of Land and its wealth is the whole focus of the corporate governments.

Now the very first question I ask people is this - how do you own your land?

The most profoundly important purchase you will ever make, the basis for all collatoral and 99.9% of people - have NO IDEA!!!

Some say - freehold. Others say - Torrens Title.

Both are wrong. And that means this - if you don't know how you own your land,
1. you then don't know WHAT you own
2. you then don't know WHAT is being taken off you.

Is that dumb or what?

The following information is with reference to the English laws under which we purchase land title's in this country. So please don't come in with the whole "no-one can own land" issue. Focus on what I am telling you.

1. Almighty God creates the land
2. We live on it and have access to the wealth found in and on it to provide for our lives.
3. The English monarch, held to the Covenant Oath to Almighty God holds the land in allodial title.
4. Allodial title means - without any interference whatsoever.
5. These lands are known as Crown Land.
6. The English Monarch, under Letters Patent, gives the Governor-General or the Cth of Australia, the permission to sell land titles into private hands.
7. Those Titles are lawfully sold ONLY in a Deed of a Grant in Fee Simple.
8. A Grant in Fee Simple Title is bound to Imperial measurements - acres, feet, inches, yards.
9. A Grant in Fee SImple allows for land to be used without interference also.
1o. However the Monarch reserves the ability to use elements of the land as defined on the Title Deed.
ie. the minerals, gravel materials, trees, etc as needed for public purposes
11. And to resume the land for public purposes at fair value.

Outside of those 2 reservations - no Letters Patent has ever been issued giving government any more power over private land or private land sales.

12. The first Title Deed of a Grant in Fee Simple was exchanged upon completion of the sale from Crown land to private land
13. The money went into Consolidated Revenue.
14. The Stamp Duty goes into a special fund to gather interest for the future payment of the Title re resumption.
15. Only legal tender can be used to purchase a Grant in Fee Simple Title.
16. The Title Deed carries a map of the land, defining each piece of land as unique.
17. Therefore the Title Deed is, in effect, a patent.
18. The Monarch's Seal of "authority" for the sale is on top of the Deed. That being the Royal Seal with the lion and the unicorn.
19. When you on sell that land, the Monarch goes with the Deed.
20. So each sale of land titles is between a minimum of 3 people.
ie. you as the seller, the other person as the buyer, the Monarch as part of the Title.

Notice - there is not one other person from government involved in that exchange. The ONLY role of govt is as the agents in the original sale. After that - they have no role whatsoever, except for the collection of stamp duty on the sale.

What rights are inherent in a purchase of a Grant in Fee Simple Title?

21. 4 elements of land use
22. Tenements - meaning YOU buy any structures on the land - houses, fences, shed, etc
23. Messuages - meaning YOU buy the right to build any structures on the land - houses, fences, shed, etc
24. Corporeal Hereditaments - meaning YOU buy the natural elements of the land - the rocks, trees, any native animal, etc

Note - the animals have the right to leave and you cannot stop them and water cannot be owned as it is a moveable object. You can contain rain water in dams, but you cannot contain a creek or river or such. You can simply use both while they are on your land.

25. Incorporeal Hereditaments - meaning YOU buy the right to USE the land in any capacity you wish, even to the extent of turning the land into "waste" - a legal term meaning take it to bedrock.

Note - this does not mean you can start a business that might cause harm to the "quiet enjoyment" of your neighbour's property through noise or sewerage run-off or whatever.

26. Those rights extend below the top of the land to the centre of the earth and as high as your eye can see and further above the top of the land.
27. The new owner is referred to as a Proprietor, because they are now the activator of the rights inherent in the Title.

28. ALL relevant High Court cases from before 2000 support this meaning of a Grant in Fee Simple.
29. Several American cases have validated the extent of the depth and height of land proprietorship.

30. No proprietor can sell only part of a Grant in Fee Simple Title. By that I mean, they cannot sell only the land but not the house. Or the house but not the land. Even the Aust Tax Act states that they are as one.
31. The Grant in Fee Simple Title is bound to the land itself. it is sold in entirely with the land.
32. Land sold with 1 or more of the 4 inherent rights is NOT sold in a Grant in Fee Simple Title.
33. Land in the Cth of Aust can ONLY be sold with those 4 rights.
34. Any land Title sold without being a Grant in Fee Simple Title is fraudulent

Now pause here folks and re-read that information. The Title you buy is a legal instrument in capacity of as much power as the Cth Constitution. And it is controlled not by you, not by the govt, but by the Monarch.

Freehold Title - what is it?
1. The colloquial reference to a Grant in Fee Simple Title.
2. However the term holds no rights described.
3. So to use it is dangerous.

Torrens Title - what is it?
1. A DEED is the only lawful way to prove your ownership.
2. Title deeds are documents that show ownership, as well as rights, obligations, or mortgages on a property.
3. Deeds are created on vellum or such for long-term protection - but the are still subject to fires, theft, etc. Or some necessary information may not have been written on them.
4. Without the Deed or the restrictions on the deed, you have no lawful proof of ownership.
5. in 1862, Sir Richard Torrens, the S.A. Registrar-General and brought in a system of title protection called the Torrens Title.
5. It went like this -
a) Government held the registry of activity on land.
b)YOU bought the land title
c) YOU paid your money and claimed your deed.
d) YOU registered that new proprietory ownership to that particular land title.
e) any mortgagee or caveat holder could do the same.
f) a land purchaser could examine the registry and be informed of every element that was involved or could interfere with a purchase.

Now take very careful note of that information. YOU can NOT buy land under a Torrens Title in this country. Torrens Title simple means that all the legal details of that land Title have been registered and therefore are recorded.

Can the government lodge legal things on your land through Torrens Title? No.
Can someone buy land in Torrens Title? No.
Torrens Title is simply a documented list of the legal actions that are attached to a particular parcel of land.

So let's establish a three key points here.

1. Mining companies DO NOT HAVE ANY POWER OVER YOUR LAND WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION. They have the right to use the Monarch's mineral reservations on the Title Deed but ONLY in agreement with you.
2. Inside the boundaries of the land, under and above, as defined in Imperial measurements - YOU are the King and the lawmaker of all who enter, unless they have the authority of the Monarch to do so under specific warrant - and that only in a criminal matter - never for legislative purposes.
3. Inside the boundaries of the land, under and above, as defined in Imperial measurements - YOU hold the right to use the land and ALL elements on that land, without interference.
4. If government want any part of your land, they can do so ONLY -
a) with your agreement
b) under authority from the Monarch
c) with full payment
And by part I do not mean they can remove an element of the title - but they must buy the actual title as it cannot be split. For to split it breaks the title. Which can not be done.

How then have Government claimed the power OVER your land title purchase that has brought us to the current situation of the death of this compliance officer?

1. As discussed, the inception of metric measurements removed Imperial measurements. OUR lawful land titles are only in Imperial.
2. The Australian Government was created without the authority of the constitutional Monarch, so the holder of the allodial title is non-existent in their corporate structure.
3. There was no legal tender to purchase land titles.
4. As land was sold, all Title Deeds were gathered and archived by the Aust Govt.

In effect, you have not paid lawfully for anything, therefore you have bought nothing.

Now you will tell me, I own the land I live on - I am paying for it - my name is on the rate notice. What you are saying is crazy!

Do you have a Title Deed? No - you have a Certificate of Title.

Show me anywhere in the Real Property Act or a Letters Patent where a Certificate of Title carries ANY lawful weight.

Does that Certificate of Title have a map defining the boundaries of your purchase? No. Then how can you tell me where it starts and ends?

Does that Certificate of Title have the Seal of Authority for a complete sale of Real Property at the top? No.
Then whose seal does it have? The State.
Show me where in law, the state can claim to be the co-proprietor of land they were never given in allodial title ownership.

Did you pay real money - legal tender - for that land title? No. Then you haven't actually completed a lawful sale for real property anyway then, have you?

Did that money you did pay go into Consolidated Revenue with the Stamp Duty going into the special fund? Don't be silly. Neither of those funds exist in the treasury of the Aust Govt!

So what exactly have you bought then folks????

Well considering the Aust Govt holds ALL the Deeds for Real Property in this country this is exactly what you have "bought" -

1. A Certificate of Title establishing that you are now in the Torrens Title registry as the current "user" of the land owned by another.
2. A contract that makes you liable for "rental" on that property - rates, etc
3. A contract that tells you exactly what you can and cannot do on that land - remember I stated way up above the proprietor of the Title is "the King and the lawmaker of all who enter"

So who gave the Aust Govt permission to keep our Deeds and set up this fraudulent "rental" scheme??

No - one. That's the whole point of David Walter's work and Criminal Complaints to every court available to us all.

No-one gave them permission. The men and women of the Australian Government and its co-governments in the State - are pirates.

They STOLE the rights to do so.

About time we stole it back folks.

And here is some reference for you - Torrens Title in each state
EXTERNAL LINK
Finally, here is a copy of the NSW Crown Lands Alienation Act 1861 - personally created by Queen Victoria herself - NOT her Parliament.

Notice - on the very first page - Crown Lands" - All Lands vested in Her Majesty which have not been dedicated to any public purpose or which have not been granted or lawfully contracted to be granted in fee simple.

Crown Land is land that has NOT been contracted out in fee simple.

The job of a lawful govt is to administer to the Monarch's land - that being Crown land.

Crown land is NOT fee simple land - so folks - any ability of any government in this country to touch, enter, make and enforce legislation over that land title is non-existent.

There in is the core of the situation with Ian Turnbull - an 89 year old gentlemen who was pushed to the edge by a criminal act and is now going to be judged by those who created the situation. Where in all that do you think he will find justice?

Glendon Turner was a senior compliance officer. The word compliance means to so as you are commanded, submit, bend over.

I have met several compliance officers - their attitude is always, "we are right, do as you are told or suffer the consequences."

As a SENIOR compliance officer, Mr Turner had established he was good at his job - making people comply.

Mr Turnbull had been forced to comply to the tune of $400,000 for acting in right of ownership on what HE thought was HIS property.

Do I have any sympathy for the dead fellow?

As a living, breathing man with a family - yes - a great deal.

As an entity getting paid to harm a living men by the criminal cartel he worked for - no.

But I will tell you this.

The people that should be on trial for murder - are his bosses. Because THEY orchestrated this situation. Turner got well paid for pushing another living man to the edge. And his bosses rewarded him for doing just that.

Ian Turnbull was simply defending himself against a criminal invasion.

Might be your turn next.




Dan Hollywood
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4166
Dogs 3 / Races 3

02 Aug 2014 04:42


 (0)
 (0)


Sorry - made an error -
Now pause here folks and re-read that information. The Title you buy is a legal instrument in capacity of as much power as the Cth Constitution. And it is controlled not by you, not by the govt, but by the Monarch.

Should read - the Title you buy is a legal instrument in capacity of as much power as the Cth Constitution. And it is controlled by you, not by govt, under the protection of the Monarch



Dan Hollywood
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4166
Dogs 3 / Races 3

03 Aug 2014 07:22


 (0)
 (0)


Nathan Trigg wrote:

Hi Dan,

I know the Bundaberg city council sent out letters to some greyhound participants last month with threats of a $ 183 000 dollar fine for breaches of the local development planning act.

Most of these letters were sent to persons you would call greyhound hobby enthusiasts though the council seems to want to class them as commercial trainers, breeders or at least are being asked to prove otherwise .

I know some of these people that made contact with council have been told to have any more than three racing greyhounds on there property it will be classed as Intensive animal use and will be required to apply for a Material change of use for there land and will incur a $6700 application fee ,running adds in the local classifieds and have a development application sign positioned on the front of there property and not to forget the associated costs of an impact assessment including environmental, water and waste management.

So basically what council is asking is that someone that wants to have four or five greyhounds will have to complete the same application as you would for a piggery or poultry farm.

Deadlines given by council were the end of June so hopefully with the assistance of local members and also state minister for local councils that a common-sense approach will prevail and a more realistic agreement can be put in place.

I think the concerning thing is the inconsistency between councils and the opportunity for a council employee to be a driving force in pushing a personal agenda.

Nathan councils have no authority over you or what you do on your land. They were established solely to provide a service to communities and if you don't use their services then you have no contract with them.
Read this link, it will explain along with proof from the Attorney General that councils have no constitutional recognition and therefore have absolutely no right to extort monies from the public.

EXTERNAL LINK


Rob Horne
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 522
Dogs 1 / Races 3

03 Aug 2014 09:23


 (0)
 (0)


Local councils are formed under state government legislation.

Technically, you may be able to argue they are an extension of the state government.

It is not mentioned the commonwealths constitution as the state governments "conferred" a number of THEIR powers to the federal government, & in doing so very clearly stated (in the constitution) that those powers not identified remained with the state governments.

Put simply: the States where here first & did not give their power of local councils to the federal gov't (they kept them for themselves).





Dan Hollywood
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4166
Dogs 3 / Races 3

03 Aug 2014 10:29


 (0)
 (0)


Rob in 1899 the constitution was adopted by the Australian people in a referendum, they knew then that they should not recognise councils because even back in those days they had learned lessons from the past and what power does to some people. It was drawn from the very best of the tried and tested wisdom of the centuries for the Rule of Law for any nation, NOT the Rule of Greedy Men who have no allegiance to anyone but themselves.
Last year they were pushing for a third referendum for constitutional recognition with the change of leadership bringing that push to a halt, and they will try again because like the Commonwealth of Australia, the states constitutions need a referendum to change also.
The Australian Constitution reigns supreme and that all other laws and rules are subject to same, so, If any laws conflict with the Aust Constitution they are invalid and illegal. Section 109 When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.
Its all about "CONTROL"
In 1932, the Tasmanian Government tried to abolish itself and hand over control to Canberra. The wise Governor General said, You can't do that, you must ask the people first. and the people said No!
In 1975, the Prime Minister Gough Whitlam attempted to defraud Section 83 regarding the Nation's money supply. The wise Governor General said, You can't do that, you must ask the people first. the people said No! The Prime Minister was sacked.
In 1990, Kim Beasley was asked a question in Parliament from Senator Button. Beasley replied, The United Nations has given the Federal Government a mandate of ownership for housing, farms, property and business to Government control, ONCE THE REPUBLIC HAS BEEN PROCLAIMED. So there you have it, the real purpose behind the push for a Republic, which will become the worst dictatorship in history.
Why ? Because of today's money power.
The councils will continue for constitutional recognition and with assistance from state and federal governments because they know they will then have full control over the people.
Because of the numbers now waking up to the governments and their corporate plan, this country will never see councils recognised, however we still need Politicians and the Governor General to stand by OUR constitution.


Rob Horne
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 522
Dogs 1 / Races 3

03 Aug 2014 11:12


 (0)
 (0)


What powers of the state government are listed in the constitution?





Dan Hollywood
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4166
Dogs 3 / Races 3

03 Aug 2014 14:31


 (0)
 (0)


Rob Horne wrote:

What powers of the state government are listed in the constitution?

The Constitution 49
Chapter VThe States
106 Saving of Constitutions
The Constitution of each State of the Commonwealth shall, subject to this Constitution, continue as at the establishment of the Commonwealth, or as at the admission or establishment of the State, as the case may be, until altered in accordance with the Constitution of the State.
107 Saving of power of State Parliaments
Every power of the Parliament of a Colony which has become or becomes a State, shall, unless it is by this Constitution exclusively vested in the Parliament of the Commonwealth or withdrawn from the Parliament of the State, continue as at the establishment of the Commonwealth, or as at the admission or establishment of the State, as the case may be.
108 Saving of State laws
Every law in force in a Colony which has become or becomes a State, and relating to any matter within the powers of the Parliament of the Commonwealth, shall, subject to this Constitution, continue in force in the State; and, until provision is made in that behalf by the Parliament of the Commonwealth, the Parliament of the State shall have such powers of alteration and of repeal in respect of any such law as the Parliament of the Colony had until the Colony became a State.
109 Inconsistency of laws
When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.
Chapter V The States
Section 110
50 The Constitution
110 Provisions referring to Governor
The provisions of this Constitution relating to the Governor of a State extend and apply to the Governor for the time being of the State, or other chief executive officer or administrator of the government of the State.
111 States may surrender territory
The Parliament of a State may surrender any part of the State to the Commonwealth; and upon such surrender, and the acceptance thereof by the Commonwealth, such part of the State shall become subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Commonwealth.
112 States may levy charges for inspection laws
After uniform duties of customs have been imposed, a State may levy on imports or exports, or on goods passing into or out of the State, such charges as may be necessary for executing the inspection laws of the State; but the net produce of all charges so levied shall be for the use of the Commonwealth; and any such inspection laws may be annulled by the Parliament of the Commonwealth.
113 Intoxicating liquids
All fermented, distilled, or other intoxicating liquids passing into any State or remaining therein for use, consumption, sale, or storage, shall be subject to the laws of the State as if such liquids had been produced in the State.
114 States may not raise forces. Taxation of property of Commonwealth or State
A State shall not, without the consent of the Parliament of the Commonwealth, raise or maintain any naval or military force, or impose any tax on property of any kind belonging to the Commonwealth, nor shall the Commonwealth impose any tax on property of any kind belonging to a State.
The States Chapter V
Section 115
The Constitution 51
115 States not to coin money
A State shall not coin money, nor make anything but gold and silver coin a legal tender in payment of debts.
116 Commonwealth not to legislate in respect of religion
The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, and no religious test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth.
117 Rights of residents in States
A subject of the Queen, resident in any State, shall not be subject in any other State to any disability or discrimination which would not be equally applicable to him if he were a subject of the Queen resident in such other State.
118 Recognition of laws etc. of States
Full faith and credit shall be given, throughout the Commonwealth to the laws, the public Acts and records, and the judicial proceedings of every State.
119 Protection of States from invasion and violence
The Commonwealth shall protect every State against invasion and, on the application of the Executive Government of the State, against domestic violence.
120 Custody of offenders against laws of the Commonwealth
Every State shall make provision for the detention in its prisons of persons accused or convicted of offences against the laws of the Commonwealth, and for the punishment of persons convicted of such offences, and the Parliament of the Commonwealth may make laws to give effect to this provision.


Rob Horne
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 522
Dogs 1 / Races 3

03 Aug 2014 20:24


 (0)
 (0)


s107 covers it.

Nb: those powers excluesively given are listed in s51.

Basically, as I said earlier, the states have the power (s107) unless expressily given to the commonmwealth (s51).

If we interprete the consititution your way it would also mean that schools, policining, hospitals, & the RTA are also unconsititutional (as they are not listed in s51 and are also created by state legislation).

Now I draw you attention to this being "the greyhound knowledge forum" NOT "the australian consitution forum".



Dan Hollywood
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4166
Dogs 3 / Races 3

04 Aug 2014 06:45


 (0)
 (0)


Although the six states joined together to form the Commonwealth of Australia and the Australian Government, they still each retain the power to make their own laws over matters not controlled by the Commonwealth under Section 51 of the Constitution. State governments also have their own constitutions, as well as a structure of legislature, executive and judiciary. They have the power to make laws for the peace, order, and good governance of their states but this is not what we see. States do NOT have the power to take away our human rights as defined in the Magna Carter.
The six states and the Northern Territory also claim they have established one further level of government.
These fraudulent local governments (also known as local councils) handle community needs like:
waste collection
public recreation facilities
town planning
These services are why councils where put in place.
History shows referendums being voted in the negative for a third level of government on two occasions now and whether you call them a branch of the state or whatever, they still don't have the authority to charge fee's and collect fines and generally stand-over the communities. When the members of the commonwealth say NO, do we not understand what that means. Yet they continue to go against the wishes of the people and harass them and push for more power. Lets not forget the PEOPLE hold the power and rule, while the government are their to govern for the people for peace and good order.
They will not stop until they have everyone one in debt and basically under their contract and control. No man has authority over another man, simple, yet you bow and give them control. Slavery at its best.


Rob Horne
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 522
Dogs 1 / Races 3

04 Aug 2014 07:10


 (0)
 (0)


Those referendums were about the federal government being able to fund councils directly & not via the state governments.

It's a bit like the federal government being unable to directly fund schools or hospitals directly (currently they must going via the state government because those bodies are a function of such).

Also you need to note that questions in a referendums are always put forth in a way that asks "do you want to change?" & as result a "NO" vote is a vote to retain the status quo.

In saying all of this: I have provided a counter view to yours. Others can decide for themselves.

Cheers




Dan Hollywood
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4166
Dogs 3 / Races 3

04 Aug 2014 08:58


 (0)
 (0)


Rob the Commonwealth provides around $5 billion per annum to the States and local governments for economic infrastructure. This funding is directed mostly to road (71 per cent) and rail (25 per cent). The Roads to Recovery receives 373.2 mil and local road grants 349.3 mil, they are only two of the many that the Commonwealth Government funds. They also announced they would provide an additional $8.2 billion over six years for land transport infrastructure projects, including a new Bridges Renewal Programme. In addition, further monies consists of revenue raised through the likes of investment interest, dividend interest, income from public enterprise and fines. One can just imagine how much they pocket and their greedy corporate bosses want more.
Their value of infrastructure is estimated to be worth $106.3 billion, of which of course belongs to their corporation.
People own their land and are by right, entitled to do as they please and that comes under common law, which is above all laws.
Its good to have other opinions Rob, that's what this site is about.





Dan Hollywood
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4166
Dogs 3 / Races 3

08 Aug 2014 23:08


 (0)
 (0)


Qld Government admits:
NO AUTHORITY over Individuals

It seems that non-victim crimes today are nothing more than a revenue source to support acres of offices full of people making marks on bits of paper, just to work out how many others are making marks on bits of paper.

When you receive a notice from ANY Gov't Department for some alleged non-victim offence, remember it is nothing more than an attempt to extort $ (property) from you. As a Private Corporation/Company eg (Queensland State Government ABN 75 818 456 675), they have no authority to do this without your consent.

And unless you are an employee of, or contracted with the Company that sent you the notice, then there is no more authority nor claim than with any other private company.

Note that the Act below has their Private Company seal and is copyrighted .. ie exclusive to them and has no application to you as a private man or woman, regardless of how threatening their words to you may be. This also includes Local Councils, Police, Courts etc ... see below for some ABNs.

For info about Seals (click here)

Corporation Seal of the
Queensland Government

Queensland

Corporations (Queensland) Act 1990

Part 2 The Corporations Law, and the Corporations Regulations, of Queensland

8 Application of regulations

(1) The regulations in force, immediately before the repeal of the Corporations Act,

under section 22 of that Act

(a) apply as regulations in force for the purposes of the Corporations Law of

Queensland; and

(b) as so applying, may be referred to as the Corporations Regulations of Queensland.

(3) To the extent that a provision of the Corporations Regulations of Queensland is

taken because of a particular application of subsection (2) to have effect, or to

have had effect, before the day of notification of the regulations referred to in that

subsection, the provision does not operate so as to

(a) affect a private persons rights as at that day so as to disadvantage that person; or

(b) impose a liability on a private person in respect of anything done or omitted to be

done before that day.

(4) In subsection (3)

private person means a person other than

(a) the Commonwealth, a State or the Capital Territory; or

(b) an authority of the Commonwealth, of a State or of the Capital Territory.

State of Queensland 2006

This "Act" is telling you that no private person is subject to any rules of this private Corporation, registered in Washington, which they call Queensland Government.
Private Natural People are NOT within the Corporation Seal of the Queensland Government and their Copyright. We are private free individuals and we are not subject to any of their laws, statutes, or rules which apply only to staff and anyone who has a contract with them.

Every Man is independent of ALL LAWS except those prescribed by nature. He is NOT bound by any institution formed by his fellow Men WITHOUT his consent. Cruden V Neale ZNC 338 May Term 1796.

The people in this corporation also includes Courts; Judiciary; Legal Fraternity; Police Service; Local Councils etc; - all are private Corporations/Companies with ABN number, subject to the "Queensland Government, subject to the Commonwealth of Australia" registered in Washington. Unless you are an employee or contractor, then you are not subject to Local Council Rates; Traffic Fines; Parking Fines etc. Rates are a tax, Under the Constitution, only the Federal Government can impose any tax.- the States cannot impose any taxes. There is no such thing as Local Government and the Referendum 1988 settled that issue once and for all. Only a Referendum can change any part of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act UK 1901 which is to protect us against tyrannical Government.

Queensland State Government ABN 75 818 456 675;

Queensland Police Service ABN 29 409 225 509 ;

Dept of Justice & Attorney General ABN 13 846 673 994;

Brisbane City Council (ABN 72 002 765 795) all other Councils have their own ABN

ABN = Australian Business Number NO Authority of the Crown. Private Businesses.

Queensland

Queensland Investment

Corporation Act 1991

An Act to provide for the constitution of the Queensland Investment Corporation, its objective and certain of its powers as a government owned corporation, and for related purposes

Part 2 Queensland Investment Corporation

10 Duty to assist transfer of property

(1) The registrar of titles and all other persons who are required or authorised to keep a register or other record about dealings in property must, if asked by the Corporation = (Queensland Government) or QTC, = (Queensland Treasury Corporation) make in the register or other record all entries necessary to record a transfer, acquisition, or vesting of property to, by or in the Corporation under this part or because of the change of trustee effected by this Act.

(2) In this section

property includes assets, liabilities, rights and contracts.

11 Corporation represents State

(1) The Corporation represents the State.

(2) The Corporation has

all the powers, immunities, privileges, rights and remedies

of the State.

State of Queensland

Constitution of Queensland 2001 No. 80, 2001

PART 5POWERS OF THE STATE

51 Powers of the State

(1) The Executive Government of the State of Queensland (the State) has all the powers, and the legal capacity, of an individual. =(NO Crown Authority)

State of Queensland

The Corporation Queensland Government; its Queensland Parliament with its (MPs) and its Private Constitution of Queensland 2001 which owns the Judiciary; controls the Legal Fraternity; Police Service; so called Public (corporate) Servants and Local Councils. All these people are under the Fraudulent Seal of the Queensland Government and their Acts are Copyrighted State of Queensland. These Acts clearly state that they only have the power, and legal capacity of an individual. These People have sworn their Oaths to a Statutory Instrument (a Piece of Paper). There is NO Crown Authority. Their Private Courts and the Judiciary; Police and Local Government dont have the Authority (power) to charge you with anything. Their Judges are appointed by Political Parties NOT by the Governor representing the Crown. The present Governor is only an office holder (Secretary) to the Corrupt Corporation Queensland Government run by which-ever (Political Party). The Police Service is only a security agency for the corrupt Corporate Queensland Government NOT for our protection (Tax collectors dressed up like a Police Force). All these above People are in contempt of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 in conjunction with Queenslands Constitution Act 1867 but are still accountable and the Vicarious Liability lies on them for the Actions taken against the Private People outside the Queensland Government.

(2) In this section

property includes assets, liabilities, rights and contracts.

assets: Your Money; vehicles; Homes; Land; anything Tangible; etc

liabilities: Debt; etc

rights: intangible having no physical existence (Freedom; Common Law Rights)

Contracts: Deed of Grant to your property

(Stylized Version of a Public Functionary Seal is NOT a Law making Seal. This Seal has NO Authority outside the Corrupt Corporation Australian Government its Parliament of Australia and its paper Queen of Australia)

ATTORNEY

GENERALS

DEPARTMENT

Corporations Act 1989 Act No. 109 of 1989

Consolidated as in force on 17 December 1998

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Drafting,

Attorney-Generals Department, Canberra.

Part 2The Corporations Law, and the Corporations Regulations, of the Capital Territory

6 Application of regulations in force under section 22

(4) In subsection (3):

private person means a person other than:

(a) the Commonwealth, a State or the Capital Territory; or

(b) an authority of the Commonwealth, of a State or of the Capital Territory

Part 4Application of the Corporations Law to the Crown

19 Crown not liable to prosecution

Nothing in this Part, or in the Corporations Law, renders the Crown in any right liable to be prosecuted for an offence. (This Corporation doesnt recognize the Crown or the People so they have NO authority over either.)




Dan Hollywood
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4166
Dogs 3 / Races 3

11 Aug 2014 04:42


 (0)
 (0)


Numbers are growing, more and more people are waking up to the corporations masquerading as governments and councils. They have one purpose and that is to CONTROL. Take the time to watch this video and do a bit of research.

EXTERNAL LINK



Dan Hollywood
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4166
Dogs 3 / Races 3

25 Aug 2014 20:39


 (0)
 (0)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsYSmvwnpQE#t=121



Dan Hollywood
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4166
Dogs 3 / Races 3

31 Aug 2014 07:06


 (0)
 (0)


Driver's Licence unlawful?

Speeding/traffic tickets are the first contact many people have with the current criminal justice system... a speeding ticket can affect your driver's record and wallet for several years.

When cars became popular, local councils (pretending to be Government), established traffic laws to limit accidents with horse-drawn wagons and ensure the animals did not bolt and get out of control of the Drivers. . But councils and private security Company/Corporations pretending to be Police Officers discovered massive revenue raising opportunities.- fines and penalties for crimes where there is no danger, no victim, even when there is not another automobile nor carriage in sight.

Since the beginning of traffic laws, drivers have received tickets for "strict liability" offenses. In other words, the person can be found guilty of breaking a law, without any criminal intent to do so. By the way, they are not Laws, they are statutes of the private Company/Corporation that dreamed them up and copyrighted them No valid Act has been made in Australia since 1973

DRIVER

According to Blacks Law Dictionary, a Driver is one who is engages in commerce on the highways. Are you transporting cargo or passengers on the Highway and make a living from that? If so, you are a Driver.- If you are not an employee or contractor with any Company/Corporation, nor charging a fee to transport passengers or goods, then you are not a driver - you are simply exercising your right to travel in your automobile (or any machine) on the Queen' Highways and By-ways. You are not a driver -ie one employed in controlling a horse (which has life) which is drawing a carriage, wagon or whatever (which has no life. Your automobile has no life..If you are not using the highways for profit, even, with the use of extraordinary machines, you as a sovereign individual under Divine Law cannot be required to have a driver's license. .

LICENCE

According to Blacks fifth edition law dictionary LICENCE means "The permission by competent authority to do an act which without such permission, would be illegal". What it is saying is if you wish to do certain acts then you are committing an offence (you are a criminal) if you do not get a license (permission) from competent authority (the true government), before you engage in those acts. Almost none of us wish to be criminals or break the law, and so we BLINDLY presume, assume that we must obtain a license.

Let us stop for a moment, and dissect this information. We know that marriage is "lawful" and we know that the government cannot give permission (license / permit) to do anything "unlawful". For example you cannot get a license / permission to beak into other peoples' homes or property because that is unlawful right? We must now realize that anything that we can do legally with a license, we can lawfully do without one.

Next we need to take notice of the fact that, if a license is permission. Then it follows that WE must have ASKED for permission. Permission is seldom given unless someone requests it. Who normally asks for permission? Children, guests, employees ask for permission. When your parents unknowingly signed your Birth Certificate, they handed you over to be become a ward of the government, a child of the State. Incompetents ask for permission. Someone incapable of handling their own affairs or who are not in control, ask for permission. Ask yourself who established government, and who has authority over government? WE DO! we just don't take the time to learn what is true authority, and Pastors and Church leaders refuse to teach you, because they now are employees of Corporations and are licensed.

Licenses are: a) a form of tax. b) a way of controlling our lives. Everything you can do legally with a permit or license you can do lawfully without a permit or license. You can feed your family (a natural lawful act) without a permit / business license. why? Because it is one of your basic human inalienable rights (the right to property, the right to work, and enjoy the fruits of your labour.

There are only three basic LAWS we could or should be accountable for
1) Injury to person (covers murder, assault, rape, slander, libel defaming ones name etc. etc)
2) Injury to property (includes physical property, intellectual property, income, loss of revenue etc. etc.)
3) Mischief (fraud) in our contracts verbal or otherwise: (Speaks for itself)

All others (statutes, and by laws) do not apply to us (such as accidentally running a stop sign at 3:00am with no resulting injured party). Statutes are only for those in commerce. All government, and so called government departments today are Private "Corporations", that is Federal, State and Local Councils and their offshoots.

Corporations exist in name only, on paper. You can find the listings of the Corporations on ASIC website. Men and women live in geographical areas known as Queensland, New South Wales etc or Australia. A man or woman cannot exist within the "Corporation of Australia" because it exists in name only. When you get a violation ticket it tells you that you were speeding in Western Australia or wherever, what they do not tell you is that they are referring to the Corporation of W A. ,

Summary:

Three things that influence our lives to a greater extent than all others are, Politics, Law, and Banking (the money system). Yet they are three of the most neglected topics in our education system. How many students graduating today can recite what their basic rights are? How many can recite 10 consecutive words from the Magna Carta or our Constitution and how many could explain the meaning of Habeas Corpus ?

It is my intent only to provide some alternative avenues of thought. Individual research and verification is the order of the day. The status quo is based both on our choices and our ignorance. As they say, "ignorance is no excuse in the eyes of the law". If you take the time to become informed and not remain silent, you will help change the status quo.



Dan Hollywood
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4166
Dogs 3 / Races 3

02 Sep 2014 10:31


 (0)
 (0)


EXTERNAL LINK

posts 56page  1 2 3