Some of you may remember the story where a couple had their property taken from them, well this is their story. Folks many of you are aware that we had our home taken off us in a fraudulent bankruptcy action. Let me tell you where that is up to. 2007 - 2008 we asked local council to validate their rates in law. They did not, so we refused the new rating contract in July 2008, whereupon council took us to court for $1100. We thought the judge would ask them to answer the question, instead the Registrar and Council's lawyer declared our defence to be unlawful and the case went to council without even being read by a judge. However, the process server for the council entered our property at 9.30pm Sunday night, past a No Trespass sign, swore at us, followed Sam in the dark causing great consternation and drove at speed through our livestock. So we sued him and the councils' lawyer for trespass. In the District Court, Judge Margaret Sidis worked actively with the defendants and we lost. In so doing she overturned High Court rulings on trespass. You cannot appeal unless you case is worth either $100,000 or the judge has broken points of law - which we thought was a 'no-brainer', yet the appeals court upheld her ruling. And the High Court, who we asked to validate that she had to obey their rulings, would not look at it. We now apparently had a debt and asked to see Sidis' signed and sealed order to authorise that we pay the other sides costs. We are still waiting for that. Without a signed, sealed order by the judge holding commission under seal, the ruling is only an opinion at best - it certainly has no force of law. So we kept asking. Meanwhile the processes moved to a Supreme Court costs assessment - meaning the claim is on sold to that corporate body and they chase it as a 'new' action. It went like this: 1. sued lawyer and process server, legally attended by a law firm working for his indemnity insurance company. 2. his personal costs, as stated in local media, $20,000 - which he carried 3. no legal costs, all covered under insurance, so his lawyers are paid. 4. insurance company on-sells debt to Supreme Court third party collections 5. lawyer fronts the new action to lead us to believe it stems from the original opinion. By now we were fully aware that this legal system did not operate under our constitution and therefore, in the original case, we had no standing and our action had no ability to succeed in their system. No lawyer told us that, no judge told us that, so the action was a fraud from beginning to end. So we asked them more questions, gave them reams of info and kept stating, give us Judge Sidis' signed and sealed orders and we will work out the payment. Never got it and the machinery kept moving. Judge Sidis could not sign that order as SHE knew she was only sitting in that courtroom in an 'honorary' capacity and had absolutely no authority to render a judgment. SHE knew it was all about who tricks the other the best and which side agrees to lose. So we stuck to our guns, the action, ignoring us all the way, went through demands, court orders, etc up to a bankruptcy, the seizure of our property and finally the sale of it. The crims took land, sold it for less than half its commercial value, to recover a debt of less than half what they got. Now there is some money left over, which we can claim but ONLY if we sign an agreement, which we won't. Why not? Because on every single court order, no judge has signed them and most of them are not sealed to any court. They are just pieces of paper with writing on them. The ONLY lawful action making this whole process lawful, would be OUR signature on this final document. UNTIL then, they are running on bluff. So we have not signed a thing, have not agreed to sign a thing, and will never sign a thing to validate this crime of larceny, this crime of fraud and harm. That means, in their corporate books, we have committed a crime because we have not identified ourselves as the persona and signed to accept the punishment! Not signing is a crime!!! Punishable by 12 months in gaol or a large fine. How scary!!! We went to court in November, they could not get us past our jursidiction as a living man and woman under Royal Law. Went again in January - same deal. Adjourned everything for 5 months until this coming June 30th. Yesterday, we got an email from the Commonwealth Department of Public Prosecutions notifying the names, the persona - that the action was being dropped. It's over. Although we don't trust them. So where does that leave us? 1. No judge had signed or sealed even one document that has been used in this whole fraudulent, larcenous action. 2. Our farm has been sold. 3. In a bankruptcy action the following is the process - "Within 14 days upon receiving the sequestration order, the bankrupt must file a statement of their financial affairs with Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia (ITSA), and all relevant business documents must be delivered. "After the filing of a statement, the trustee can begin to administer the estate and call meetings with creditors whenever:" AFTER the filing of the signed statement - which has not yet occured. the trustee can BEGIN to administer the estate - they have already done that. Uh oh. In every case the judge's made sure they could not be held to account in this. They rendered 'interlocutory orders' - meaning the process is not over. 'ex tempore' judgments meaning there was no research into the judgment. And even blanked out our address in the orders!! WE have never signed anything, so no authorization given from us. Now the Commonwealth DPP is not going to attempt to force us to sign anything. Therefore authorization for the whole process has come from where? 1. Judges - no 2. Us - no 3. Cth DPP - no 4. Lawyers running the case and trustees of the estate? Well they are the only ones left. Yet they could not act until they got the signed stated as stated in their own legal acts. And the inspector sheriff who removed us from our property did so at an address, NOT ordered by the judge, but at an address given him ONLY by the lawyers and trustees. Uh oh. Have they been left holding the can or what! Now we sent them ALL - every judge, registrar, lawyer, etc involved, a bill some months ago. And of course, they have all been informed of the demanded action in the ICJ. What was in our bill? Biblically, if you steal something and can return it, you are to do so with restitution of 2 'somethings.' Not money, but 2 of the stolen items. if you steal and SELL that something, you are to restore to the person stolen from 5 of the 'somethings.' So what was stolen and sold of ours? I farm, 657 acres, 12 titles, over 1 mile of creek with permanent water. 137 pure boer goat with kids at foot. Machinery, trucks, various farm items. That bill was accepted and stands IN the Australian Government's commercial operation AND by the living men and women involved. So that bill now exists both in commercial law AND common law. Fact: 1. The Australian Government is a commercial corporation registered ONLY in Washington D.C. for borrowing. 2. Margaret Sidis held a workplace agreement with the Australian Government. 3. The lawyers on both sides hold practising certificates with the Australian Government. 4. The lawyer and process server we sued held practising certificates and registration with the Australian Government. 5. The insurance indemnifier holds a registration and licence with the Australian Government. 6. Neither Sam or I as a living man and woman, held any kind of contract with the Australian Government in this matter. 7. Margaret Sidis, in the honorary role of judge, had no lawful ability to render a decision that was binding on ANY man or woman. 8. the money demanded was in promissory notes of the Australian Government. 9. The property stolen was real property bound in Imperial measurements, under the Cth of Australia, to our jurisdiction as living men and women. Therefore as we were unable to defend ourselves in any capacity in their jurisdiction, yet the land taken is protected in our jurisdiction - we were personally invaded, on private property, as an act of war. We have now been given all sorts of options on how to handle this - ALLLL beneficial for us - and you. Will let you know what we do, when we do it! And remember this - what the ICJ will ask ALLLLL the criminals working in the Australian System of Governments is a simple question - Who gave you your authority to do what you are doing? From there - the criminal cases will just flow. Becoming a lawyer trained only to and in OUR constitutionally lawful structure will be a profitable occupation then I would think. Right now, any lawyer registered in the Australian system, is fair game. It is only right we warn them I think. Sue Maynes.
|