home - to The Greyhound-Database
Home  |  Dog-Search  |  Dogs ID  |  Races  |  Race Cards  |  Coursing  |  Tracks  |  Statistic  |  Testmating  |  Kennels  
 
   SHOP
Facebook
Login  |  Private Messages  |  add_race  |  add_coursing  |  add_dog  |  Membership  |  Advertising  | Ask the Vet  | Memorials    Help  print pedigree      
TV  |  Active-Sires  |  Sire-Pages  |  Stud Dogs  |  Which Sire?  |  Classifieds  |  Auctions  |  Videos  |  Adoption  |  Forum  |  About_us  |  Site Usage

Welcome to the Greyhound Knowledge Forum

   

The Greyhound-Data Forum has been created to act as a platform for greyhound enthusiasts to share information on this magnificent animal called a greyhound.

Greyhound-Data reserve the right to remove any post that is off topic, advertisements or opinions they consider to be offensive.

Please read the forum usage manual please note:

If you answer then please try to stay on topic. It's absolutely okay to answer in a broader scope but don't hijack posts by switching to something off topic.

In case you see an insulting post: DO NOT REPLY TO IT!
Use the report button to inform the moderators so that we can delete it.

Read more...

All TopicsFor SaleGD-WebsiteBreedingHealthRacingCoursingRetirementBettingTalkLogin to post
Do you have questions about greyhound racing?
Do you need advice on how to train a greyhound?

The {{{{{ SHORTAGE }}}} is here.page  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 >> 


Steven Martin
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 7681
Dogs 180 / Races 66

28 Jul 2017 09:52


 (2)
 (0)


Bruce Teague wrote:

1. Trials at public tracks are underpinned by the industrys and the clubs efforts to supply that facility to use. Therefore it is fair to insist that the information is made public. Of course, in the case of a stewards trial there is no option.

2. Trials at private trial tracks can fairly be said to be just that private.
3. Such trials as are published frequently omit useful information box number and sectional times, for example. Not good.
4. The value of trial data is dubious anyway as it is usually performed alone or in a small field. More generally, it may indicate the dogs overall fitness which is useful to a point.
5. It is common for interstate visitors in feature events to trial publicly but not all do. I would make it compulsory. It is good for both the dog and the public.
6. An allied subject is the need to tell stewards about any relevant illness or injury prior to the race as required under racing rules. Seldom do we hear about those. Indeed, I can recall a couple of dogs (with leading trainers), one a bigtime stayer the other an Egg winner, where we heard about their problems only after the event.

Hi Bruce & others. If the industry was receiving it's fair share of TAB distribution and not getting ripped-off, I'd start a blog on every dog I owned, telling you what colour sh1t was dumped every morning & night. I'd even take a picture if that tickled your fancy.
You can WANT all you like. Here in Queensland, we've been WAITING a new race-track that has been promised for nearly 8 years.
Jump in the queue.




Mathew Wright
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 48
Dogs 0 / Races 0

28 Jul 2017 10:56


 (4)
 (0)


Bruce when was the last time you have proof someone painted a dog and trialled it ,it's not the 70,s mate if you want times get up and clock them yourself and give them a pat while your at it to see if the trainer is trying to pull a swifty ha ha it's laughable ,and you obviously don't watch a lot of horse trials or talk to anyone who owns horses because if you did you would realise there is a human on the back with instructions such as "we are here for a soft one" and "look after him/her early keep them balanced and find the line late " and "we need a good hit out so give him a good blow"
And which rider is given what instructions is none of your business that is deservadly owed to the owners firstly who pay the bills and the trainer that does the work .
So if people like yourself (edit admin) think you deserve access to that info to make your job easier to make money on the punt,than take up the challenge and own and train them yourselves and your opinion might change


Mark Donohue
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 3236
Dogs 6 / Races 0

29 Jul 2017 04:12


 (1)
 (0)


Bruce Teague wrote:

It seems that some people don't like the racing rules and others want to run dogs with injuries. Big problem.

.
Bruce,
There you go again speculating what trainers do or don't do. That's why there's a scratching device available to trainers. I see many, many dogs scratched every week for various reasons. You should become a trainer and / or go to the track and learn more from a practical perspective. Maybe just 'feel' a dog walking on a lead for a week. Sometimes, it's worth its weight in gold



Bruce Teague
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 2092
Dogs 0 / Races 0

29 Jul 2017 04:44


 (0)
 (0)


Terry,
Mid-1927 actually in Glebe, Sydney. Followed in December by clubs in Cessnock, Maitland and two in Newcastle. Microfiche of old Newcastle Herald copies will show pictures of monkeys on the greyhound's back parading down Hunter St to publicise the upcoming racing.

No doubt there are great trainers, average trainers and poor trainers. Like cricketers, footballers, doctors and dentists.

Live baiting, in the view of many quoted trainers and all the public, is disgusting, unnecessary and certainly illegal. In my view, an even bigger worry is that, in each of the three states, top trainers were involved. That alone calls for an independent investigation into why (not what) it happened. So WDA were asked to do the job.

A major key to WDA findings was that the practice was burnt into the culture of some trainers on traditional grounds - my dad did so I did it. Nudge, nudge, wink, wink. Consequently, WDA then encouraged GRNSW to attack that issue.

Could someone else have done the WDA job? Not sure but I doubt you would have found any with better basic qualifications, never mind the greyhound background. WDA is also a group so you then tend to avoid an individual's bias, if any.

A related point is that it may have been hard to find a vet or vets within the industry who were not already tied up with either greyhound customers, clubs or authorities, and therefore had a conflict of interest. The WDA people were at least well separated.

A related point is that all the reviews conducted in the three states (with one small exception for the state's chief vet in Melbourne) all failed to delve into the reasons for this cultural problem. All they could talk about was changing the laws and adding more people (at great expense). They all also botched the breeding and euthanasia questions by repeating false figures passed on by the McHugh Commission (ex GA).

Your last point concerns finance etc, which is crook. Why so? Almost certainly because the industry is run by amateur clubs supervised by bureaucrats, not business managers, all of whom seem to regard a good result as doing what you did last year plus a fraction. For major maintenance clubs just ask the authority for a handout, much like the kids needing ice cream money. Their commercial and negotiating abilities are poor or absent - witness the TAB commission sagas in NSW and the loopy handling of the arrival of corporate bookies (Chairman Percy Allan made a speech demanding that owners and trainers have nothing to do with them (at the Greyhound Social Club). Go figure!

Lastly, your list of great trainers includes at least one who was a perennial druggie. Who can say how he got all his winners?

What else needs fixing? Tracks. All of them. They vary from ordinary to really disruptive and all are amateur-built.

Another odd point. Within the greyhound fraternity in general are quite a few blokes who are prominent and successful businessmen in their day jobs, often in hi-tech industries. Yet if they took their greyhound decision-making back into their businesses they would go broke in a matter of months. IE, the system beats them - so change the system.



Terry Jordan
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 6018
Dogs 0 / Races 0

29 Jul 2017 13:28


 (6)
 (0)


Bruce: I feel this could go on forever. (No Winner) But I do feel obligated to answer your points posted.
Live Baiting, What about Gutted frozen Rabbits, bought from Rabbit meat farms. Excess buck Rabbits, old stock etc. Who and WHY is this so disgusting to? What is natural to a Greyhound Bruce? We have both wild dogs, and Rabbit infestation up my way, Poisoning is allowed, actually Law to rid them from your property if excessive.
Both die an agonising death over 2-4days. Now Working dogs here (Kelpies, Border Collies, Cattle Dogs) are often under nourished, Flea ridden, filthy, Worm-Riddled, rarely Vaccinated. Do these Animals come under the Protection of WDA Bruce.
Greyhound Racing has been around for 90 years, WDA since 2013?
Greyhounds are being portrayed by WDA as something unique, special, Mystical if you follow the way they are to be treated.
Council dog pounds here (Kyogle-Casino) are located at the local tip sites. Un-manned from 5pm to 8am . 15 hours ALONE Bruce, can you see the ridiculous situation of 24/7 care for Greys?
Now if someone wants to throw hundreds of thousands at you to produce a report or make recommendations. YOU GIVE THEM WHAT THEY WANT, Don't you? McHugh report also comes to mind (15 million bucks)
Bruce you never answered my questions Re; WDA Evidence of their experiments, Vet quali's, Time frames, add how many dogs? who supplied them? Ages of dogs? etc.
Remember Bruce in McHugh's report they stated VERY OFTEN the work in Specialist Dog Behaviour, by their SPECIALIST VETS!! And torn to shreds by Vet Liz Brown!!
These same SPECIALIST VETS locked up and isolated many dogs in Qld for fear they were some how suffering physic problems.

Finance Bruce: All MONIES COLLECTED at GBOTA tracks, go to their head/office in Sydney. Trial-Monies, Gate takings. That's why Clubs still need to run raffles.
Ever been asked to buy a TICKET at the Thoroughbred Races, to help pay their Track, Training, Wages, Repairs??? Read last week where the are spending 3mil here 2.5mil there for training track improvements in Sydney. Dogs get Zilch!
Our very own Racing Minister (Former T. Grant) recommended last year we receive only 10% Tax Parity money. WHO WENT IN TO BAT FOR US
Yes you got that one right!
How's the Spoke & Wheels concept going? How's the Centre's of Excellence progressing? How much improvements have been made at any track? Qld are still waiting for a replacement Gold Coast track as PROMISED by the then BLYTH GOVERNMENT over 8 years ago. This Liberal Govt in NSW, is suffocating the Industry!

Now Bruce: Perennial Druggie, I assume you mean GB? His name is still along side those many many group winners he trained. He gave up many hours free time, working on the old Geelong track I believe
He was outted after a raid on his property, which turned up a supply of Pain/Killers. Not for Administering them.!
Yes Bruce, poor trainers are being labelled as Drug Cheats now for miniscule amounts of Cobalt and Arsenic (most don't know how or why it happened) But ALL ARE ENCROURAGED TO PLEAD GUILTY to receive a lesser penalty.

Your last point re: Businessman owners- Jobs etc.
Easy to answer, hope you understand. They do it because it's a hobby, they love the sport, the Animal, the Passion. NOT FOR WHAT THEY CAN GET OUT OF IT. Have you owned dogs Bruce? did you have a hands on approach? It's 12.30am nite nite


Trevor John Rhodes
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 81
Dogs 0 / Races 11

29 Jul 2017 23:17


 (2)
 (0)


Live baiting is illegal, writing about it isn't so keep bringing it up Bruce while telling us all to move on.

A major key to WDA findings was that the practice was burnt into the culture of some trainers on traditional grounds - my dad did so I did it. Nudge, nudge, wink, wink.
How many trainers did they interview to come to that finding? As long as someone said it would have been good enough.

Could someone else have done the WDA job? Not sure but I doubt you would have found any with better basic qualifications, never mind the greyhound background.

Basic qualifications making expert reports, yeah that'll do! That's all you need to become a politician.

WDA is also a group so you then tend to avoid an individual's bias, if any. Like the lack of bias in groups like Greens or political parties?

Its not all negative Bruce, your points on track design and injury are worth looking at.

Sorry Terry I think I sent you a PM somehow when looking to reply.


Sandro Bechini
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 19488
Dogs 15268 / Races 1856

30 Jul 2017 00:00


 (3)
 (0)


Bruce Teague wrote:

However, some of the first ones I cut are low grade races at city tracks, all 600s, where rafferty's rules apply, and most long races where you can't be sure how they will back up.

For example, I would not believe anyone that Burn One Down was anywhere near 100% last Saturday at Meadows. He plodded. A likely reason - a record breaking LAW run 6 days earlier at Sale. Kohnke called these "gutbusters". Happens all the time.

Thank Christ Thompson didn't follow your advice last night as Burn One Down absolutely trotted in with the Destini Fireball Stayers Final, off a 7 day back up

In fact if it was left to your way of thinking the final may have been held next November when it was fully documented that all the finalists were over last weeks run

In fact, may be the Olympics should be held over a 12 month period to ensure that the human athletes aren't over exerting themselves


Nicholas Arena
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 233
Dogs 10 / Races 0

30 Jul 2017 00:08


 (4)
 (0)


I don't believe there is a single participants who doesn't appreciate Live Baiting is an unnecessary practise of past years.
The critical point is,with the support of the WDA, all forms of animal rewards are now banned - even a piece of meat or a tanned hide - for heavens sake.
The impetuous decisions taken in respect to chasing incentives ,is at the core of what is holding back Breeding and the inability to get sufficient greyhounds to do what they were bred to do "Chase".
The solutions to increase breeding and improve chase factors are not that difficult - the solutions requires some courage from those that have over reacted to admit they got it wrong and in turn make some subtle changes to chase incentives.Unfortunately when it comes to Public Servants and Politicians , courage is in short supply.




Ryan Vanderwert
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 5958
Dogs 8 / Races 0

30 Jul 2017 00:49


 (0)
 (0)


i realise this is an exremely emotional topic, however most of your points(some very good), are lost in the emotion and personal sledging

really good topic Steven


Mark Staines
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4498
Dogs 70 / Races 14

30 Jul 2017 01:17


 (1)
 (0)


Nicholas Arena wrote:

I don't believe there is a single participants who doesn't appreciate Live Baiting is an unnecessary practise of past years.
The critical point is,with the support of the WDA, all forms of animal rewards are now banned - even a piece of meat or a tanned hide - for heavens sake.
The impetuous decisions taken in respect to chasing incentives ,is at the core of what is holding back Breeding and the inability to get sufficient greyhounds to do what they were bred to do "Chase".
The solutions to increase breeding and improve chase factors are not that difficult - the solutions requires some courage from those that have over reacted to admit they got it wrong and in turn make some subtle changes to chase incentives.Unfortunately when it comes to Public Servants and Politicians , courage is in short supply.

The leaders of the Alliance and GBOTA have no "INTESTINAL FORTITUDE"



John Watts
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 976
Dogs 7 / Races 6

30 Jul 2017 02:41


 (1)
 (0)


Nicholas Arena wrote:

I don't believe there is a single participants who doesn't appreciate Live Baiting is an unnecessary practise of past years.
The critical point is,with the support of the WDA, all forms of animal rewards are now banned - even a piece of meat or a tanned hide - for heavens sake.
The impetuous decisions taken in respect to chasing incentives ,is at the core of what is holding back Breeding and the inability to get sufficient greyhounds to do what they were bred to do "Chase".
The solutions to increase breeding and improve chase factors are not that difficult - the solutions requires some courage from those that have over reacted to admit they got it wrong and in turn make some subtle changes to chase incentives.Unfortunately when it comes to Public Servants and Politicians , courage is in short supply.

Nicholas they were bred to hunt in a natural state, and thier reward was food and survival, we now have inorganic rewards that do not reinforce their instincts, a wet skin or properly prepared carcases will. Their instincts have evolved over eons and we are now expected to believe we can trick their dna with an onion bag or artifical noise in 24 months.




James Saunders
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4644
Dogs 3 / Races 3

30 Jul 2017 02:50


 (0)
 (0)


In time they may adapt to chasing rags steroid free with the same vigour as yesteryear.Problem is we don't have that time or money putting up with all the non chasers.


Terry Jordan
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 6018
Dogs 0 / Races 0

30 Jul 2017 05:10


 (0)
 (0)


Come on guy's talk of YESTERYEARS, EONS, DNA, INSTINCT etc. It took WDA just a few months to CHANGE all that. (What a wonderful state of euphoria, they have produced) God! if only Dogs could talk!



Mark Staines
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4498
Dogs 70 / Races 14

30 Jul 2017 05:24


 (0)
 (0)


Yes it wont be long before Anti Greyhound Racing N.S.W. "DECREES" that all Greyhounds must be fed a "NO MEAT DIET"


Bruce Teague
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 2092
Dogs 0 / Races 0

30 Jul 2017 05:59


 (0)
 (0)


Steven, to return to the original question, there are some indications that increases are in order although, as ever, cash available may be a problem. Consider a brief sample.

In this last week, SEQ has run 74 races at 7 meetings. Two meetings had 12 races (at Albion)and the other 5 had 10. Of the 74, 10 or 13% were short of a full field. By comparison, Victoria had 259 races and 30% of those had fewer than 8 runners. I don't study NSW in detail but the two Wenty meetings had 5 short fields out of 20 - ie 25%.

Broadly, all this is symptomatic of the national scene where breeding is in modest decline and average starters per races are likewise. But the two big greyhound states are the biggest problems.

Having said that, there may be a case for Qld to increase the number of races a little. Whether they can pay for them is another matter. However, whatever else happens, there is obviously room for more Grade 5 dogs to replace the lower class fields - especially at Albion on Thursday. But you are unlikely to get them from Victoria.

In the medium term, I cannot fathom how NSW can maintain its existing numbers because it is going to run out of money paying Morris Iemma and company. That suggests some dogs may want to cross the border - and some of them are not far away.



Ryan Vanderwert
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 5958
Dogs 8 / Races 0

30 Jul 2017 07:41


 (1)
 (0)


I've only been looking at Albion for the last 2.5 months and I like watching racing there a lot.

Don't know if the ptb in Qld plan is by stealth or accident, but those figs indicate something is working and cant fault the integrity of their racing personally. I've really enjoyed the product so far.

For me the choice was either watch Qld or WA racing. The holdback for WA is the time difference.

If Qld keep persevering and take a few steps marketing their product............the southern states may just have opened the gate for Qld to get more than just a look in.


Michael Geraghty
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4138
Dogs 14 / Races 15

30 Jul 2017 08:58


 (2)
 (0)


Ryan Vanderwert wrote:

I've only been looking at Albion for the last 2.5 months and I like watching racing there a lot.

Don't know if the ptb in Qld plan is by stealth or accident, but those figs indicate something is working and cant fault the integrity of their racing personally. I've really enjoyed the product so far.

For me the choice was either watch Qld or WA racing. The holdback for WA is the time difference.

If Qld keep persevering and take a few steps marketing their product............the southern states may just have opened the gate for Qld to get more than just a look in.

Ryan,

I'm glad you like watching QLD races...make sure you record them so you can look back in later years and enjoy, because QLD is NOT immune to the shortage.
There is a 60% reduction in breeding for ALL STATES...it's NATIONAL!!!
Call me an alarmist if you like but a 60% reduction of breeding is NOT meekly modest! It's HUGE and it's not getting any better.

QLD fields have for quite a few years now, been made up of around 40% of NSW dogs.
So 60% of that 40% WON"T be in the QLD racing pool in the very near future. The local pool will ALSO be depleted by 60%.
Probably unbeknown to you, the call for extended noms have recently accelerated for ALL meetings.
Our numbers have been bolstered by NSW dogs for so long...won't be as the clock ticks on.

The cancer grows unless something is done very quickly to give confidence back to the breeders.
It is too late to avoid the huge dip in the numbers in the next 24 months.
If the tide doesn't turn NOW, we are out the door.

Don't forget to press record.

Oh, BTW, ...
Quote - "I've only been looking at Albion for the last 2.5 months and I like watching racing there a lot."

From an Owner/Trainer's POV, not so good.
The Albion Park circuit was never designed to accommodate a one turn start,(331m), so next time you watch one of them, count how much interference at the 600m boxes turn. Then count how many dogs run off that same turn like they have lost their steering wheel.
The 395m start is right on the bend so they jump out of those boxes onto a surface that is around 35*...too bad if you're an average jumper.
The Ipswich 431m corner start is diabolical...watch.
The track camber at Ippy is far less than Albion so make sure you watch the 520m races there, especially the younger dog races.
Not blaming anyone...it's what we have to work with and is what is on the plate.
Second thoughts, I'd like to blame all those people who are responsible for us NOT GETTING A ONE TURN TRACK IN 8 YEARS!!!


James Saunders
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4644
Dogs 3 / Races 3

30 Jul 2017 09:27


 (0)
 (0)


wasn't tweed going to relocate to qld?As nsw showed no interest when they sold that land.



Ryan Vanderwert
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 5958
Dogs 8 / Races 0

30 Jul 2017 09:28


 (0)
 (0)


Michael Geraghty wrote:

So 60% of that 40% WON"T be in the QLD racing pool in the very near future.

That's 24% and I dont see it that way at all. It may be that the quality may be reduced for a time, just depends on how the ptb in Qld want to proceed, from here.

What I'm saying the product is quite good as it is today, the integrity of the sport is being upheld from what i see, and if the ptb decide to take up the challenge, there is an opportunity for Qld greyhound racing to be promoted to the country and therefore make it's mark . That's what I know from watching racing there for the last 2.5 months.

You've been hammered by the southern states in the past, in my view here's your states chance to do something.



James Saunders
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4644
Dogs 3 / Races 3

30 Jul 2017 09:40


 (0)
 (0)


Ryan the whole industry revolves around people stumping up thousands of dollars with a real live chance of no returns producing the stock for trainers to train betters to bet on and admin to administer but they have left and I get this funny feeling many of you guys don't get it.There gone and so are the dogs in two years.

posts 529page  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 >>