home - to The Greyhound-Database
Home  |  Dog-Search  |  Dogs ID  |  Races  |  Race Cards  |  Coursing  |  Tracks  |  Statistic  |  Testmating  |  Kennels  
 
   SHOP
Facebook
Login  |  Private Messages  |  add_race  |  add_coursing  |  add_dog  |  Membership  |  Advertising  | Ask the Vet  | Memorials    Help  print pedigree      
TV  |  Active-Sires  |  Sire-Pages  |  Stud Dogs  |  Which Sire?  |  Classifieds  |  Auctions  |  Videos  |  Adoption  |  Forum  |  About_us  |  Site Usage

Welcome to the Greyhound Knowledge Forum

   

The Greyhound-Data Forum has been created to act as a platform for greyhound enthusiasts to share information on this magnificent animal called a greyhound.

Greyhound-Data reserve the right to remove any post that is off topic, advertisements or opinions they consider to be offensive.

Please read the forum usage manual please note:

If you answer then please try to stay on topic. It's absolutely okay to answer in a broader scope but don't hijack posts by switching to something off topic.

In case you see an insulting post: DO NOT REPLY TO IT!
Use the report button to inform the moderators so that we can delete it.

Read more...

All TopicsFor SaleGD-WebsiteBreedingHealthRacingCoursingRetirementBettingTalkLogin to post
If you need help or advice about a dog you are retiring then this is the place for you.

Speed can killpage  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 

Sandro Bechini
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 19488
Dogs 15268 / Races 1856

20 Dec 2019 05:07


 (0)
 (0)


Ron

you are right


Bruce Teague
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 2092
Dogs 0 / Races 0

20 Dec 2019 05:54


 (1)
 (0)


Sandro Bechini wrote:

And now you are bagging Michael as well...even though he was declared fully innocent of all charges concerned regarding conflict of interest

I don't care what you say.

You don't punt anymore because you can;t win.

That's looking in the mirror, pal.

I am done with you, you refuse to take anything on board any logical discussion that's being discussed with you that doesn't conform to your view

Honestly, Bruce, you are now acting like a clown and becoming more ridiculous with every new post you make


Sandro,

Once again, you persist to skewing quotes to your liking. I was actually complimentary about Eberand if you read more carefully. Nevertheless it was the conflict of interest that initiated the kerfuffle in the first place and prompted him to resign. His action, not mine. The correction came much later following a normal investigation.

And you are still on about this punting nonsense. Why not give up when you know nothing about the subject? Funnily enough your words are correct - I cannot win any longer for three reasons I have announced in some detail previously - crook tracks, crook fields and hopeless pool sizes, to say nothing about corporate rip-offs. Only a fool would continue in that context. It is plain as a pikestaff that most serious dog punters have given it up, too. Have you actually investigated the patterns, context and trends of today's betting climate?

As for "logical discussion" - where? All I am reading is abuse and a total lack of supportable evidence - although Ryan has put up his views, albeit incomplete. Others don't even do that. Try reading through the whole file again.




Simon Moore
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 2366
Dogs 32 / Races 393

20 Dec 2019 06:13


 (3)
 (0)


see you are giving him a reason to respond, lol.

people go on and on about his continued rubbish but they keep replying to him and wonder why.

its not rocket science, pmsl.




Michael Geraghty
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4138
Dogs 14 / Races 15

20 Dec 2019 07:17


 (1)
 (0)


How about this...

We open up a betting account and open up a thread called - "TORNADO'S SWEAR TIN"

Anyone guilty of responding or addressing Tornado has to put $10 into the kitty.

Each month we invest the money on the stayers races where they back up after 7 days.

If TT races at Sandown, we load up...

Lol.




Sandro Bechini
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 19488
Dogs 15268 / Races 1856

20 Dec 2019 07:54


 (1)
 (0)


Bruce Teague wrote:

Sandro,

What I actually said was that I would never put trainers and breeders on the board due to an unavoidable conflict of interest.

Indeed, at one stage I thought Eberand would be an exception as he had a wide background.

But I was wrong - he bit the dust anyway.

And then you gave him a backhander....so you hand out the compliments with one hand and then slap him with the other, as if he actually did anything wrong to earn the treatment he got

I bet you have never even spoken to him but you sit in judgement of him like you do....from your little hole in the world

You should be ashamed of yourself

He was one of the best greyhound participantss who could have ever been elected to the Board of GRNSW




Bruce Teague
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 2092
Dogs 0 / Races 0

20 Dec 2019 23:32


 (1)
 (0)


18 Dec
As for the Sale Cup heat next Friday, the Watchdog has some odd points to make. TT has never raced there but Watchdog says it will lead (on sectionals) but needs luck mid-race. I doubt the former but agree with the latter. It is not great value at $1.90. The Watchdog picks the country NSW dog, Dont Mind Me, to win but prices it at $7.50, with TT second. Hard to add all that up.

21 Dec - After the 20 Dec Cup Heats
In practice, TT jumped well enough in the Cup heat but showed no pace at all and therefore ran into scrimmages at the first turn (which can be very tight and messy). Thereafter it managed to plod into 4th place in an overall time of 37.57, which is fairly common for 5th grade events. Later, its conqueror at Geelong, Blazing Cartier, just failed to catch the flying Waging War but still recorded a smart 37.03 on its own and will take the kennel into the final.

Nothing too surprising here, other than it suggests few older dogs can maintain or repeat their earlier form over the longer trips. The only thing justifying TTs short price (SP $2.70) was emotion. Even a two week break did not help, although Blazing Cartier probably benefitted.

Trivia: Of the 30 heat starters, eight were by Barcia Bale, six by other Wheeler sires, and five by Kinloch Brae.

Future: Next time the Sale track gets some attention, it is not only the 520m start that warrants a fix but also the nearby (first) turn for 650m racers. Much too sharp!

Applause: Good on the Ballarat club for organising a 660m series which allows candidates to choose between a variety of Prelude dates to qualify for the final. That helps avoid the 7-day backup issues.



Bruce Teague
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 2092
Dogs 0 / Races 0

21 Dec 2019 21:25


 (2)
 (0)


A letter writer in The Australian today offered some interesting thoughts.

Our society is losing the ability to think rationally
12:00AM December 20, 2019

It was encouraging to see your editorial (Media panic on climate, bushfires and a vacation, 19/12). Most of our societys organisations and citizens are as bad as the media. Western societies are losing their critical thinking skills. Logic and facts used in arguments are being abandoned.

Lazily, we are adopting emotional and irrational arguments based on myths, fiction, or factoids. We no longer have open and inquiring minds and a desire to politely engage with those who hold different views.

On hearing a different view today, we react in two ways. To preserve our rational arguments, we retreat to an echo chamber with like-minded people. There our irrationality can be reinforced. When we are not in our echo chamber, we attack the messenger not his ideas.



Bruce Teague
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 2092
Dogs 0 / Races 0

21 Dec 2019 21:56


 (1)
 (0)


Sandro Bechini wrote:

Bruce Teague wrote:

Sandro,

What I actually said was that I would never put trainers and breeders on the board due to an unavoidable conflict of interest.

Indeed, at one stage I thought Eberand would be an exception as he had a wide background.

But I was wrong - he bit the dust anyway.

And then you gave him a backhander....so you hand out the compliments with one hand and then slap him with the other, as if he actually did anything wrong to earn the treatment he got

I bet you have never even spoken to him but you sit in judgement of him like you do....from your little hole in the world

You should be ashamed of yourself

He was one of the best greyhound participantss who could have ever been elected to the Board of GRNSW

Sandro,

You have completely missed the point. As Eberand himself recognised, it is the principle that must be dominant. The conflict of interest issue demands that a director must pull out of discussions which involve a subject in which the director is personally concerned.

I am struggling to think of a single agenda item which would NOT overlap Eberand's fields of owning and training. Is there one? If so, it would be pretty obscure.

In fact, the tenor of the entire selection and appointment process calls for candidates to be independent of current activities - although not past activities. That is government policy, and correctly so. I agree with it.

Personalities have got nothing to do with it.

Incidentally, there was no such thing as "the treatment he got", whatever that means. Eberand himself initiated all the action, first by resigning and then by disproving the charges against him. In the end, justice was not only achieved but "was seen to be done".

PS: Of some 6,000 or so trainers in this country I have met only a few. Most I would not know from a bar of soap.


Sandro Bechini
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 19488
Dogs 15268 / Races 1856

21 Dec 2019 22:07


 (1)
 (0)


Bruce Teague wrote:

Sandro Bechini wrote:

Bruce Teague wrote:

Sandro,

What I actually said was that I would never put trainers and breeders on the board due to an unavoidable conflict of interest.

Indeed, at one stage I thought Eberand would be an exception as he had a wide background.

But I was wrong - he bit the dust anyway.

And then you gave him a backhander....so you hand out the compliments with one hand and then slap him with the other, as if he actually did anything wrong to earn the treatment he got

I bet you have never even spoken to him but you sit in judgement of him like you do....from your little hole in the world

You should be ashamed of yourself

He was one of the best greyhound participantss who could have ever been elected to the Board of GRNSW

Sandro,

You have completely missed the point. As Eberand himself recognised, it is the principle that must be dominant. The conflict of interest issue demands that a director must pull out of discussions which involve a subject in which the director is personally concerned.

I am struggling to think of a single agenda item which would NOT overlap Eberand's fields of owning and training. Is there one? If so, it would be pretty obscure.

In fact, the tenor of the entire selection and appointment process calls for candidates to be independent of current activities - although not past activities. That is government policy, and correctly so. I agree with it.

Personalities have got nothing to do with it.

Incidentally, there was no such thing as "the treatment he got", whatever that means. Eberand himself initiated all the action, first by resigning and then by disproving the charges against him. In the end, justice was not only achieved but "was seen to be done".

PS: Of some 6,000 or so trainers in this country I have met only a few. Most I would not know from a bar of soap.

You have no idea what you are talking about.

If you did, you would know where I was coming from.

Just leave it at that before you dig a bigger hole for yourself



Michael Geraghty
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4138
Dogs 14 / Races 15

22 Dec 2019 00:19


 (3)
 (0)


Bruce Teague wrote:

A letter writer in The Australian today offered some interesting thoughts.

Our society is losing the ability to think rationally
12:00AM December 20, 2019

It was encouraging to see your editorial (Media panic on climate, bushfires and a vacation, 19/12). Most of our societys organisations and citizens are as bad as the media. Western societies are losing their critical thinking skills. Logic and facts used in arguments are being abandoned.

Lazily, we are adopting emotional and irrational arguments based on myths, fiction, or factoids. We no longer have open and inquiring minds and a desire to politely engage with those who hold different views.

On hearing a different view today, we react in two ways. To preserve our rational arguments, we retreat to an echo chamber with like-minded people. There our irrationality can be reinforced. When we are not in our echo chamber, we attack the messenger not his ideas.

Probably has some relevance except when you are dealing with an obsessive, compulsive, and dangerously arrogant narcissist.


Mark Donohue
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 3236
Dogs 6 / Races 0

22 Dec 2019 02:47


 (2)
 (0)


The letter writer is making a general and personal point based on no facts or proof. Its just an opinion. Its not fact. He/She should not be using, we because I have not spoken to him/her, so loses credibility straight away. Sounds like other writers I know.


Bruce Teague
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 2092
Dogs 0 / Races 0

22 Dec 2019 03:38


 (1)
 (0)


Sandro,

Re "You have no idea what you are talking about.
If you did, you would know where I was coming from.
Just leave it at that before you dig a bigger hole for yourself".

I offered a reasonable reply to your criticism of the Eberand matter. I included specific reasons which are well accepted in government and business worlds in general as well as in board appointment policies in greyhound racing.

Consequently, I have no idea what you are talking about or where you are coming from.

Incidentally, while I have not had a personal conversation with him, I did listen intently to Eberand's address to the NSW Parliamentary Inquiry. He made a good case.

Meantime, it would help if people here discussed the stayers' questions. A couple have, but most just throw rocks and decline to offer evidence or reasons. That achieves zero.



Michael Geraghty
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4138
Dogs 14 / Races 15

22 Dec 2019 04:35


 (2)
 (0)


You're lucky you weren't born in another era, Tornado Rocks.
They used to use people like you for entertainment.
For much less blasphemy, I might add.

EXTERNAL LINK




Mark Donohue
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 3236
Dogs 6 / Races 0

22 Dec 2019 06:06


 (2)
 (0)


He wouldnt last very long.... lol.




Michael Geraghty
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4138
Dogs 14 / Races 15

22 Dec 2019 08:18


 (0)
 (0)


I'd happily pay to hire a crane...


Sandro Bechini
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 19488
Dogs 15268 / Races 1856

22 Dec 2019 08:41


 (0)
 (0)


Bruce Teague wrote:

Sandro,

Re "You have no idea what you are talking about.
If you did, you would know where I was coming from.
Just leave it at that before you dig a bigger hole for yourself".

I offered a reasonable reply to your criticism of the Eberand matter. I included specific reasons which are well accepted in government and business worlds in general as well as in board appointment policies in greyhound racing.

Consequently, I have no idea what you are talking about or where you are coming from.

Incidentally, while I have not had a personal conversation with him, I did listen intently to Eberand's address to the NSW Parliamentary Inquiry. He made a good case.

Meantime, it would help if people here discussed the stayers' questions. A couple have, but most just throw rocks and decline to offer evidence or reasons. That achieves zero.

As I said, you don't know what you are talking about in this case

And even less about stayers

Discussing anything with you achieves zero

Can we leave it there now?



Bruce Teague
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 2092
Dogs 0 / Races 0

22 Dec 2019 22:43


 (1)
 (0)


Mark Donohue wrote:

He wouldnt last very long.... lol.

But probably much longer than the poorly planned effort to revitalise Cessnock.



Mark Donohue
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 3236
Dogs 6 / Races 0

23 Dec 2019 05:13


 (4)
 (0)


If you know me, youd know that I wasnt involved in the demise or the effort to revitalise Cessnock. Yes, I know it was just a generic comment and a kinda like Cessnock.. However, since youve raised Cessnock, Ill comment. If its an attempt to keep the thread going, well you are simply pathetic.

I heard from a reliable source what had happened to It and IMO it is one of the best, if not the best track in Australia to race your dog. You can waste everyones time with your thoughts on other things involving the running and viewing of races there, because Greyhound Racing in NSW is contracting so the authority is not likely to open a new track.

We should meet one day and share information on why you failed. It might get you out of your apartment and away from your keyboard for just a little while, but you cant smoke in my presence.


Bruce Teague
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 2092
Dogs 0 / Races 0

23 Dec 2019 19:58


 (1)
 (0)


Mark Donohue wrote:

If you know me, youd know that I wasnt involved in the demise or the effort to revitalise Cessnock. Yes, I know it was just a generic comment and a kinda like Cessnock.. However, since youve raised Cessnock, Ill comment. If its an attempt to keep the thread going, well you are simply pathetic.

I heard from a reliable source what had happened to It and IMO it is one of the best, if not the best track in Australia to race your dog. You can waste everyones time with your thoughts on other things involving the running and viewing of races there, because Greyhound Racing in NSW is contracting so the authority is not likely to open a new track.

We should meet one day and share information on why you failed. It might get you out of your apartment and away from your keyboard for just a little while, but you cant smoke in my presence.

Mark Donohue
PM meAustralia
(Verified User)
Posts 2658
Dogs 6 / Races 0
09 Feb 2018 02:03

As a result of abandoned meetings and problems with racing in the Hunter Region e.g. Gosford and The Gardens, I hereby initiate a petition for the return of racing at the best one turn grass track in Australia, Cessnock. Even this weekend, one of the Region's meetings has been sent to Richmond instead of swapping over the dates between Gosford and Maitland.
.
A simple Yes or No if you agree or disagree.
No discussion required or warranted. Discussions may be culled.
The results will be mentioned and endorsed at the Greyhound Branch of the Shooters Fishers and Farmers Party Meeting held on 24 February 2018, 12 midday at Wyong RSL.

* * * * *

Pawnote: The Cessnock's protests and legal appeals at its de-licensing ended up costing the industry $500k when the club could not pay its legal bills and other costs and so dumped them on GRA. So far as I am aware, that cash has never been repaid.



Mark Donohue
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 3236
Dogs 6 / Races 0

23 Dec 2019 20:49


 (3)
 (0)


A petition, voicing my and others concerns, was not a coordinated effort to revitalise Cessnock. The petition was not presented to the SFF Party - Greyhound Branch.. I did not vigorously campaign. Ive said and written many thoughts that are opinion. You need to talk to people involved in Cessnock to see what they did to revitalise it. You wouldnt know what a good track is because youre not a trainer. Even Jodie Lord stated she would travel the extra distance to race there. You just dont have the feel for it. You dont get it. You just get on here because you have nowhere else to go.

Amongst many things, Ive voiced my concerns about MNC not having TAB status and it was promised about three years ago. I didnt campaign for it. It might just eventuate when Grafton goes into recess for construction, albeit 9 meetings to start with.



posts 359page  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18